Wednesday, August 08, 2012


Ponsering the Sikh temple shooting, Conor Friedersdorf writes:
In the name of counterterrorism, many Americans have given their assent to indefinite detention, the criminalization of gifts to certain charities, the extrajudicial assassination of American citizens, and a sprawling, opaque homeland security bureaucracy; many have also advocated policies like torture or racial profiling that are not presently part of official anti-terror policy.

What if white Americans were as likely as Muslims to be victimized by those policies? What if the sprawling national security bureaucracy we've created starts directing attention not just to Muslims and their schools and charities, but to right-wing militias and left-wing environmental groups (or folks falsely accused of being in those groups because they seem like the sort who would be)? There are already dossiers on non-Muslim extremist groups. In a post-9/11 world, Islamic terrorism has nevertheless been the overwhelming priority for law enforcement, and insofar as innocents have suffered, Muslims have been affected far more than any other identifiable group, because the bulk of the paradigm shift in law enforcement hasn't spread beyond them.

Would that still be true if the next terrorist attack on American soil looks like Oklahoma City? How would President Obama or President Romney wield their unprecedented executive power in the aftermath of such an attack? Who would find that they'd been put on no fly lists? Whose cell phone conversations and email exchanges would be monitored without their ever knowing about it?
We might have a serious counterterrorism crackdown against whites in the near future, but we absolutely won't have a serious counterterrorism crackdown against right-wing whites. If a future large terrorist attack is conducted by a Weathermen-like group, the hammer will come down on lefties; by contrast, if the next big attack is like Oklahoma City, the reaction will be ... well, like the reaction to Oklahoma City: there'll be no crackdown on like-minded people, no significantly stepped-up surveillance, no nationwide cloud of suspicion, no wave of new laws. That's for non-whites and lefties only.

The key factor isn't just skin color -- the '60s and '70s leftists who were tracked by law enforcement were mostly white. The key factor is that right-wing extremists share a lot of beliefs with the mainstream right -- they're anti-cultural elite, anti-urbane, distrustful of government, unswervingly opposed to gun control, and fed up with programs meant to help non-whites, the poor, women, and gay people. That's the resemblance that matters in this society, not skin color; that's why we'll never consider a serious crackdown on right-wing extremism, however organized and violent right-wing extremist groups become. No liberal or left-centrist president would dare challenge the pro-"regular American" bias that protects right-wing extremists, and no Republican would even dream of cracking down on the far right.


Victor said...

The only way the right-wing white terrorists would EVER get major notice, is if they pulled-off their own version of 9/11.

And even then, if it was white supremacists that flew into the two towers, the Pentagon, and that field in PA, I don't think Bush would have given his bullhorn speech.

Instead, every mechanism of government that Republicans controlled, would have been either involved in the cover-up, or on blaming any BUT the white terrorists.

Maybe that seems crazy, but that's what I think. At least right now. And I don't see anything that might dissuade me from that thinking, in the near future.

The next McVeigh, an ex-military right-winger, is out there.

But we'll never know, because we'll be out there looking for swarthy people who pray to a different God than we do.

Steve M. said...

A right-wing 9/11 would have been the work of "a few bad apples."

Elvis Lives said...

You mean to say that 9/11 actually wasn't the work of right-wing white terrorists?

I'm shocked.

Michael Bindner said...

Last I checked, Wahabiism was pretty right-wing.

Michael Bindner said...

Also, the right-wingers pay their NRA dues on time.