Wednesday, May 16, 2012

MATH IS HARD! THAT'S WHAT VOTERS THINK, AND REPUBLICANS TAKE FULL ADVANTAGE

I recommend Jonathan Chait's analysis of Mitt Romney's demagoguery on the debt and deficit. I want to comment on one part of it:

Not only does Romney elide vast swaths of established facts about the deficit, it's fairly clear that he does not operate within the mainstream understanding of the term "deficit" at all. As Jonathan Bernstein has repeatedly explained, modern Republican behavior and even language in relation to the deficit is completely nonsensical if you understand "the deficit" to mean the gap between revenue and outlays. Republican use of the term only makes sense if you define "the deficit" to mean "spending Republicans don't like." That's why Republicans consider it impossible to believe that one could simultaneously extend health insurance to the uninsured while reducing the deficit.

Look at Romney's terms to describe deficits, and it's pretty clear he has adapted himself to his party's conceptualization of it. His speech includes the following phrases:
a financial crisis of debt and spending
Washington has been spending too much money
out-of-control spending sprees, or to piling up massive amounts of debt
This is why I do not, for one moment, share my opponent's belief that our spending problems can be solved with more taxes.
In Romney's telling, the terms
debt and spending are essentially interchangeable. When presented with Obama's position -- that the solution to the debt ought to include both higher taxes and lower spending -- he rejects it out of hand.

Well, of course Romney treats "debt" and "spending" as if they're interchangeable terms -- ordinary Americans struggle to understand the national debt and budget deficits, and, being a Republican, Romney's certainly not going to make understanding these concepts any easier, is he? Much better for the GOP if Romney takes advantage of the fact that the public already confuses debt and spending; it's much better for the party if Romney reinforces that sense of confusion, which the GOP has spent years trying to induce. The right has the American people just where it wants them -- misunderstanding these things in precisely this way, and thus blaming all debt and deficits on the spenders. Romney's just carrying on the right's existing work, which has borne great fruit for the party.

Democrats compound the problem because they're afraid to say that there are good government programs that voters clearly want, and therefore those programs need to be funded, and therefore taxes are necessary, which means the important thing is to take in an appropriate amount from an appropriate mix of taxpayers, not to just look for spending cuts. Democrats will never, ever say this outright -- even though everyone now knows that the public wants the rich to be taxed more, and even though people often say they'd pay more in taxes to pay for popular programs -- because Democrats never want to remind voters that government exists.

So Mitt deceives voters on how budgets work, even though we know he (unlike a lot of Republicans, including officeholders) knows better. But we knew he was a cynic, didn't we?

4 comments:

Victor said...

Yes, because the cowardly Democrats don't know how, or even try, to counter-message.

The "tell" was when, after finally passing a nascent health care program after over a century, after the R's unfairly criticized it, the D's went running away from legislation that actually allowed government to be an intermediary to better, and less expensive, health care.

They RAN AWAY!
FROM HEALTH CARE!
Instead of defending it - these wuss's feckin' RAN AWAY - the feckin' cowards.
THEY FECKIN' RAN AWAY FROM THEIR OWN LEGISLATION!!!

Also too - what do you do with a party, when the DNC decides NOT to spend money in the WI re-election?
WHAT?!?!?!

WHAT DOES FECKIN' DO?!?!

Steve M. said...

I can't tell if they're taking a dive in Wisconsin (in return for billionaire cash to Obama) or if they're just being Spock-like in reference to Wisconsin: "Hmmm ... we're the national party. This is a state election. Surely there's no point in getting involved...."

Erik A. Prince said...

Cynic? Maybe, but a more accurate Romney label would be Opportunist. It fits his Bain history and his mind bending flexibility on policy.

The GOP has done a remarkable job of confusing the important issues. They see an informed citizenry as a liability, and rightly so. If the American people had a firm grasp on Debt, Deficit, Spending & Revenue they might just notice how contradictory GOP policies actually are.

Ten Bears said...

If the American people had a firm grasp on anything at all they might just notice how contradictory GOP policies actually are. 'Couse, with a head full of Ambien, Prozac, Viagra and crotch-shots on Fox Kool-Aid, that ain't gonna' happen any time soon.