Chuck Todd on Twitter this morning:
Just who is Jill Kelley? She seems to drive folks to do some dumb things: a general, an FBI agent and a potential rival mistress
— Chuck Todd (@chucktodd) November 13, 2012
So yesterday it was Paula Broadwell who was the Evil Temptress Femme Fatale without whom none of this would have happened. Now it's Kelley, who enraged an otherwise perfectly proper Broadwell, made an FBI agent send her shirtless photos against his will, and forced General John Allen, commander of America's NATO troops in Afghanistan, to exchange tens of thousands of e-mails with her. None of these people had the potential to do any of these things until she came along! She twisted their arms! (Or some other body parts.)
A pundit I've repeatedly criticized, Frank Bruni, is actually good on this. He wrote today's column back when Paula Broadwell was the Demonic Temptress of this story (her role until, I guess, a few hours ago), but what he says applies equally to the new slut-shaming of Kelley:
There were remarks galore about her unusually toned arms and the way she dressed to show them off. I even spotted a comment about how much of her armpits one of her outfits revealed, as if underarm exhibitionism were some sort of sexual sorcery, some aphrodisiac, the key to it all.And, I'd add, not-so-mighty men, like Shirtless FBI Guy.
What else could explain his transgression? Why else would a man of such outward discipline and outsize achievement risk so much? The temptress must have been devious. The temptation must have been epic.
That was the tired tone of some of the initial coverage of, and reaction to, the affair between David Petraeus and Paula Broadwell....
Broadwell has just 13 percent body fat, according to a recent measurement. Did you know that? Did you need to? It came up nonetheless. And like so much else about her -- her long-ago coronation as homecoming queen, her six-minute mile -- it was presented not merely as a matter of accomplishment, but as something a bit titillating, perhaps a part of the trap she laid.
...the anecdotes and chatter that implicitly or explicitly wonder at the spidery wiles she must have used to throw the mighty man off his path are laughably ignorant of history, which suggests that mighty men are all too ready to tumble, loins first.
Quite a bit of this is specific to the circumstances -- powerful older men flattered by younger women. That's the point of the rest of Bruni's column -- that powerful men (Clinton, Gingrich, Edwards) cheat with women who are "fonts of gushing reverence." That's true. But ultimately what's going on is just sex. Horny people aren't behaving admirably, and some of the horny people are people we've been told are morally better than we are. We're naive if we believe that.
"Drive folks to do dumb things"? For all of these people, that was obviously a very short drive.
****
Title inspired by D.C. mayor Marion Barry's words on surveillance videotape of his 1990 drug arrest.
5 comments:
Why is it that I suspect that this wasn't the first time General Petraeus found a younger holster for his pistol?
So let me understand this, Bush and Cheney get to walk away, scott-free, after lying us into war, torturing people, and spying on citizens - but having some sexy-time with a woman not your wife, means you have to resign? Or, like Clinton, get impeached?
I'm starting to come around to the idea that, ok, this schmuck did wrong, he can't be disgraced anymore than he already has been, so why not put him back in the position, and tell him he has the shortest leash in history?
And if this was someone other than the vastly over-rated General Petraeus, and some of the disasterour things he's been involved wih, I'd say go ahead.
Victor, why do you assume Petraeus was forced to resign. It seems to me that becoming the central figure in this Peyton Place scandal would have caused a lot of people to crawl under the couch and stay in a fetal position for the rest of their lives. Of course, he's lucky to be a Republican, so if he ever does want a public career again, at least he won't always be introduced as "the disgraced ex-General".
DanP,
LOL!!!
Turns out "General Betray Us" was pretty damned accurate.
There are those that would argue "the honorable thing to do..." ignorant (of course) that were it honorable, it wouldn't be necessary. To my experience, it has violated at least eighteen articles of the Military Code, adultery none the least. I wouldn't suggest it "do the honorable thing" because it had no honor to begin with... were it so it wouldn't be in this position to begin with.
[Yes, "it". Less than sufficiently evolved. Less than Human.]
Our national focus on whether and how much of Paula's armpits were showing while we approach the fiscal cliff, war rages in Syria, Iran is centrifuging uranium, radicals infuse Pakistan which has the bomb, and our infrastructure is rotting out from under us (viz. New York after the hurricane).... all this is God's way of telling us we're all a bunch of imbeciles.
Crankily yours,
The New York Crank
Post a Comment