President-elect Donald Trump said in a weekend interview that he is nearing completion of a plan to replace President Obama’s signature health-care law with the goal of “insurance for everybody,” while also vowing to force drug companies to negotiate directly with the government on prices in Medicare and Medicaid.He says he doesn't want single payer, but a lot of people who should know better think that's precisely what he's talking about. RoseAnn DeMauro, the pro-single-payer head of a nurses' union that endorsed Bernie Sanders, already said earlier this month, regarding single payer, that "The one I’m counting on the most is Trump." And last night there was this from an anti-Trump Republican strategist:
Trump declined to reveal specifics in the telephone interview late Saturday with The Washington Post....
In addition to his replacement plan for the ACA, also known as Obamacare, Trump said he will target pharmaceutical companies over drug prices.
“They’re politically protected, but not anymore,” he said of pharmaceutical companies.
... Trump pointed to several interviews he gave during the campaign in which he promised to “not have people dying on the street.”
“It’s not going to be their plan,” he said of people covered under the current law. “It’ll be another plan. But they’ll be beautifully covered. I don’t want single-payer. What I do want is to be able to take care of people,” he said Saturday.
Everyone just now discovering Trump is pro-single-payer: I told you this was why I decided to oppose him whatever the difficulty.
— Liz Mair (@LizMair) January 16, 2017
And this from a Washington Examiner writer:
Trump's quotes in this interview are consistent with single-payer, but not with any GOP alternative ever. https://t.co/MFDwC2mgLm
— Philip Klein (@philipaklein) January 16, 2017
And this from a senior vice president at the Kaiser Family Foundation:
Trumpcare: Insurance for everybody and lower deductibles.I'm intrigued. https://t.co/puzC6PTaIW
— Larry Levitt (@larry_levitt) January 16, 2017
First of all, there's no plan, and Trump says he intends to finalize the plan only when his designate for health and human services secretary, Tom Price, has taken office:
“It’s very much formulated down to the final strokes. We haven’t put it in quite yet but we’re going to be doing it soon,” Trump said. He noted that he is waiting for his nominee for secretary of health and human services, Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.), to be confirmed. That decision rests with the Senate Finance Committee, which hasn’t scheduled a hearing.Price, who's in the House now, cooked up his own plan a while back, one Politico called "radically conservative." Kaiser's Larry Levitt was not pleased, nor were other advocates of universal coverage:
“Young, healthy and wealthy people may do quite well under this vision of health care reform,” said Larry Levitt, a senior vice president at the nonpartisan Kaiser Family Foundation. “But the people who are older and poorer and sicker could do a lot worse.”Trump's promises are of the say-anything variety familiar to anyone who paid attention to Trump University:
... “When it comes to issues like Medicare, the Affordable Care Act and Planned Parenthood, Congressman Price and the average American couldn’t be further apart,” said New York Sen. Chuck Schumer.... “Between this nomination of an avowed Medicare opponent to serve as HHS secretary and Republicans here in Washington threatening to privatize Medicare, it’s clear that Republicans are plotting a war on seniors next year.”
... “They will … not just roll back five or 10 years of progress -- but 50.” said Anthony Wright, executive director of Health Access California, a consumer advocacy group that supports Obamacare.
The ads for his university were classic Donald Trump -- Trump stares into the camera and proclaims:Beyond that, this would be the first time Trump took on not just one company but several entire industries -- the health insurance industry, the drug industry, the medical devices industry, and so on. This is also when he takes on the Koch network, and possibly talk radio. (Fox would fall in line.) This wouldn't be like criticizing the Iraq War or insulting John McCain -- the opinion-shapers on the right were all too willing to let him get away with that if it seemed he was motivating the GOP base. In this case, the interests of many, many large corporations would be at stake, not just one at a time, as in some of his recent Twitter skirmishes. After the presidential campaign, Trump seems unbeatable, but he'd be going after the kinds of people who've beaten him in business in the past, and he'd be angering a lot of them at once. He'd be overmatched.
"We're going to have professors and adjunct professors that are absolutely terrific people, terrific brains, successful. We are going to have the best of the best... and these are people that are handpicked by me."
... [But in] Trump's own deposition [in] December [2015], Trump failed to recognize the name of a single presenter or teacher at his real estate seminars. He also confirmed he had nothing to do with the selection process of instructors who taught at the school's events or mentors for the school's "Gold Elite" programs.
A review of Trump University presenters and so-called real estate experts found many with questionable credentials and inflated resumes. Court documents show background-checks conducted during the hiring process could not determine whether some instructors even graduated high school.
But it's not going to happen. Price and his crew will give Trump a godawful, classically Republican plan, and he'll sell dross as gold, the way he did with Trump U. It's not clear whether he'll know he's selling a terrible plan, but he'll sell it anyway. He'll never admit that the plan's coverage is less than universal, that the cost is a budget-buster, or that the coverage the most vulnerable will be able to obtain is dreadful. We might as well call it Trump University Care.
8 comments:
"Trump declined to reveal specifics "
----------------
And that's all we need to know. He has never provided specifics on anything because he has no specifics and never will.
It is amazing how many in the Village Media treat this B's as extraordinary performance art and which captured the "American people" (apparently 73 percent who voted for someone else or who did not vote don't count as Americans). As Driftglass says, the 27 percent who rub shit in their hair will be ferocious in saying that when the Republicans cut their Medicare & have them eating cat food it will be the Black Guy's fault for giving all the good stuff to illegal brown people.
Even if he actually wanted to implement single payer care -- and I don't think he does -- Derp Fuhrer can only sign what Congress passes. And there is no way in hell that Paul Ryan or Mitch McConnell will ever let a single payer bill to hit the floor for a vote.
Ask t-RUMP the same question 7 days a week, and you'll get 7 different answers.
And then, onto the next week, and the one after that.
And then he'll ceramoniously fire people he'll blame who didn't/couldn't get him what he said he wanted - which hed knew was BS.
And then a new month of different answers - followed by firings.
It'll like some game show.
No, not "The Apprentice."
More like The Price is RIght!" - or will be, for the people he'll pick to fire.
IF Trump believes in any of this, which I don't think he's given a second thought about, it's probably his own narcissistic faith in the power of "deals." He might think that he can just speak forcefully about what he wants and important people will quiver and then jump to do them. That's the only thing he's ever done successfully anyway: make demands, then try to stiff or otherwise ruin the other side.
xxx
How long will it be until people learn to ignore him? This promise of a replacement for ACA will come to nothing.
Good, bad or indifferent, it has done a pretty good job of trolling the system so far.
Insurance isn't "care".
Ten Bears
Post a Comment