Wednesday, February 24, 2016

CHRIS CILLIZZA LISTS POSSIBLE TRUMP RUNNING MATES, SKIPS OBVIOUS PICK

Chris Cillizza writes:
On "Morning Joe" Tuesday morning, host Mika Brzezinski threw out an interesting theory: Donald Trump and Marco Rubio are playing nice with one another -- and savaging Ted Cruz -- because a backroom deal has been cut between the two to form a ticket with Trump as the presidential nominee and the Florida senator as the second in command.

I don't think that deal has been cut. But Brzezinski's speculation did get me to thinking about whom Trump might pick as his vice president.
Cillizza goes on to produce an odd list. It doesn't include Ted Cruz, because "The Donald seems to genuinely loathe the Texas senator," yet it does include Carly Fiorina, despite their obvious mutual enmity, as well as Nikki Haley, who used her State of the Union response to attack Trump in front of a national TV audience. Cillizza's other names are more plausible -- Sarah Palin (yes, she's box-office poison, but Trump may not realize that), Florida governor Rick Scott (a fan and a guy who's survived in politics a lot longer than he should have, given his checkered past in the private sector), and businessmen Carl Icahn and Jack Welch.

But one possible choice isn't on Cillizza's list -- in fact, Cillizza's lede almost seems to be an attempt to divert attention from this candidate:

Joe Scarborough.

Recall that in late January, in a radio interview with Hugh Hewitt, Scarborough refused to rule out a VP draft:
HEWITT: If he did ask you. It's just a hypothetical. It's just an if. If he asks you, would you say yes?

SCARBOROUGH: I don't know. I don't think he would ask me. Again, you always get me in trouble with these questions. So let's move on.

HEWITT: No, Joe, pause with me for a second. It makes perfect sense. You're not the first person I've told this to. I've told a number of people. Trump will ask Scarborough to be his running mate. For a whole variety of reasons, especially Florida. And you're not a stranger to Virginia. And you know your way around politics. So just really -- would you say yes?

SCARBOROUGH: I will say this, and I've said this on the air. And so this is not really any secret at all. I'll do anything that will get -- will stop us from eight more years like the past eight years we've had.

HEWITT: Amen. And so if that included saying yes, you'd say yes?

SCARBOROUGH: I think I'd put myself in your category. I would do just about anything to try to get the White House back.

HEWITT: Alright, that's a yes! I mean, that's a yes Joe.

SCARBOROUGH: That's not a yes
Scarborough, however, did subsequently tweet this:



But Scarborough's decision to host a not-exactly-hard-hitting Trump town hall last week led Fox's Greg Gutfeld to speculate:



To be fair, Gutfeld also speculated about other jobs Scarborough might be seeking:



Please note that Gutfeld was tweeting on the night of the town hall -- in other words, before the public heard the fawning between-segments banter of Scarborough, Trump, and co-host Mika Brzezinski, which was leaked by Harry Shearer a few days later. (Go read Matt Taibbi's piece on that shameful event if you haven't already.)

Maybe Scarborough wouldn't want to risk a secure gig by running for VP (although there's been speculation in the past about a possible Scarborough run for the presidency). But I think he's in the mix. Though this is Trump we're talking about, so who the hell knows who'd be on his list?

10 comments:

petrilli said...

You know what they say in politics, "live boy or dead intern."

retiredeng said...

Trump and Scarborough? Two dicks in a... er... peas in a pod.

BKT said...

That's a winning ticket if I ever heard one: a reality-TV pretend boss with no concept of what governance is, and whose name ought to be synonymous with failure, and a vaccine truther.

Also, R.E.M.'s best album is Document.

mlbxxxxxx said...

The most obvious choice for Trump's VP is Donald Trump, Jr. They might have some residency issues but nothing insurmountable.

Trump/Trump 2016!

Erik C. said...

Hey, Steve

Kinda OT, but have you read this?


https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2016/02/24/why-trump-could-be-tougher-in-general-election-than-you-think/

If so, whattya think?

Steve M. said...

I definitely think Trump can win, though he's the weakest candidate the GOP has in the top three. Waldman talks about Trump possibly having appeal in "Rust Belt states like Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Michigan that have been in the Democratic column in the last two elections," but I've been saying forever that the GOP already appeals to White voters in those states -- look at how many of them have elected GOP governors, senators, and/or state legislatures in the Obama years. (See also Wisconsin, Iowa, Maine, Illinois, and Colorado.)

But Trump can't moderate his thug act too much or GOP voters will suddenly realize that warnings about his malleability were accurate -- he's going to have to keep saying vicious things about Mexicans and Muslims and other right-wing Antichrists or he's going to lose a lot of the angry base. And then he might not pick up very many swing voters. So he has a needle to thread, and I'm not sure he can do it.

Victor said...

Joni Ernst for Trump's VP.

She's a more coherent Palin, and she castrated pigs in her youth!
On second thought, never mind...
Trump might be wise to choose someone else... ;-)

Peter Janovsky said...

Scar is toxic for Rs on guns.

Sweet Sue said...

We in the know call it "Morning Blow."

Ten Bears said...

Isn't he the one that killed a (white) female intern while in Congress?