It wasn’t so long ago that Republicans were congratulating themselves for having put forward the most diverse group of presidential candidates from either political party, ever.There's no "paradox" here. If you're not a white male, to attain success with the Republican Party's voter base you're expected to specifically renounce the politics of inclusion. Thus we have Cruz and Jindal, both immigrants' sons, rejecting birthright citizenship. We have Marco Rubio now saying we shouldn't even consider a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants in the next decade. We have Ben Carson accusing the Black Lives Matter movement of "bullying." We have Carly Fiorina refusing to name a woman she'd like to see on the $10 bill and saying, "I wouldn't change the $10 bill or the $20 bill. I think honestly it's a gesture. Don't think it helps to change our history. What I would think is we ought to recognize that women are not a special interest group."
But the message Americans are hearing from the 2016 GOP field is sounding more and more exclusionary. That was evident most recently in a comment from retired neurosurgeon Ben Carson, who is running near the top in national polls, that he “absolutely would not agree” with a Muslim becoming president....
There is no small paradox at work in the shrillness of the rhetoric. The Republican field is more representative than ever of an increasingly diverse America....
Among the 15 Republican candidates are an African American (Carson), a woman (Fiorina), two Cuban Americans (Sens. Marco Rubio of Florida and Ted Cruz of Texas) and an Indian American (Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal)....
But the chief dynamic that has driven the fight for the nomination is a current of anger in the GOP base, aimed at what many see as unsettling cultural and political changes and a party establishment that they believe has failed them.
If you want to succeed in the GOP as a woman or person of color, you need to embody the message that acknowledging unequal treatment of certain groups is a liberal plot. That's why there's no contradiction between a diverse Republican presidential field and the torrent of hate and disrespect we've seen from the candidates and voters. It's all part of the same mindset.
6 comments:
And that's what makes them the Bigots and Billionaires Party.
These people understand nothing about the benefits bestowed upon republican lackeys of the "non-traditional" type. Couple that with an (incorrect) conflation of motivations on opposite sides of the political divide as "identical" and you get this bullshit. I suspect a need to maintain the "both sides do it" narrative/disease is at the heart of it.
If Carson wanted to destroy his campaign, all he would have to do is say that BLM have a point are come out in favor of criminal justice reform.
Yup -- that seems to be part of what's destroying Rand Paul's campaign.
Tokenism is not diversity. Carson and Fiorina wouldn't be leading the pack if they didn't tick certain demographic boxes. One appears to sleep walk through life and the other failed miserably at the only thing she ever did. Herman Cain was also wildly unqualified yet he led in the polls for some unexplained (!) reason until his sexual prowess was revealed. In contrast, I don't remember Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton, both unqualified, imo, for office, leading the polls when they ran for president. The party of "affirmative action" didn't practice it when the chips were down. The GOPers will nominate anyone for POTUS since they have no respect for government anyway, it doesn't matter what doofus gets the pick -- just make it a strategic one.
Even the white boys have to play that game if they have "strayed" from the exclusionary corral. Ergo, Jeb!, born the pastiest of WASPs, but one who lives in a Spanish-speaking, multicultural home (with "little brown" children, as Pappy Bush once put it), said this week, "We should not have a multicultural society."
Marie
Post a Comment