WHY THE SUSIE WILES STORY WILL CHANGE NOTHING

You might have expected the Vanity Fair profile of Susie Wiles to cause friction in Trump World and harm the administration overall. But I regret to say that the Trumpers are responding shrewdly. Rachael Bade, a former Politico journalist, writes on her Substack:

Within hours, the long tail of Wiles’ power and deep relationships across Trump World whipped into a rescue mission. Without so much as a summons, longtime allies from the campaign trail and others inside her orbit cleared their schedules and showed up at the White House to ask how they could help, I’m told from multiple sources. During a huddle in the West Wing, a fire crackling in Wiles’ office, they set to work on a damage-control plan to push back on the story as unfair — and activated the entire Cabinet.

All day, MAGA figures and Cabinet secretaries alike took to social media to defend Wiles and deride the story as a “hit piece” with “cherry-picked” quotes taken out of context....

“That’s called circling the motherfucking wagons,” as one Wiles loyalist and Trump ally told me tonight. “If you look at the reaction on the Hill, if you look at MAGA World and all the people who rallied behind her in a period of eight hours, it shows the depth of loyalty to the president. It shows the depths of loyalty to the chief of staff.”

For example:

Hilarious. The WH had all the Cabinet members simultaneously put out statements supporting Susie Wiles after the Vanity Fair article came out.

[image or embed]

— Ron Filipkowski (@ronfilipkowski.bsky.social) December 16, 2025 at 12:34 PM

Wiles, a seasoned political operator, is pretending she was snookered.

Lady with obvious daddy issues who is wily as fuck pretends she was snookered by an all powerful magazine writer. Hey, Susie: It’s 2025 and you have been the main handmaiden to your boss dad’s heinous war against the media. As if you are a victim.

[image or embed]

— Kara Swisher (@karaswisher.bsky.social) December 16, 2025 at 7:42 PM

That will be persuasive to the only voters Trump and his aides care about: the base. They think literally every story they don't like is 100% fabricated, so they'll believe that there was some "context" in which the things Wiles said didn't have the plain meanings they obviously had.

There's another reason this won't have an impact:

Trump and Vance literally said they agreed with Wiles, Musk has acknowledged his ketamine habit, and Vought probably thinks Wiles was complimenting him.

[image or embed]

— Steve M. (@stevemnomoremister.bsky.social) December 17, 2025 at 8:36 AM

Trump addressed the "alcoholic's personality" assertion in a phone conversation with a New York Post reporter:

“No, she meant that I’m — you see, I don’t drink alcohol. So everybody knows that — but I’ve often said that if I did, I’d have a very good chance of being an alcoholic. I have said that many times about myself, I do. It’s a very possessive personality,” Trump said, a teetotaler who has frequently cited the 1981 death of his older brother Fred at age 42 of an alcohol-induced heart attack as the main impetus for his abstinence.

Vance copped to conspiratorialism in a speech yesterday afternoon.

"But, conspiracy theorist. Sometimes I am a conspiracy theorist, but I only believe in the conspiracy theories that are true," he [said] as the crowd cheered and applauded. "And by the way, Susie and I have joked in private and in public about that for a long time."

And we know Musk has no shame about his drug use, nor does Vought have any shame about his extremism. In fact, one of the main reasons the White House doesn't see this as damaging is clearly the fact that Wiles accused the administration of doing things and believing things the rest of us think are unconscionable, but Republicans don't. Trump freed even the most violent January 6 rioters? Trump's base loves that! Trump is leaving hundreds of thousands of people to die by shuttering USAID programs? The base thinks it's a good thing when non-Europeans from countries that are seen as shitholes die painfully! Compassion? Soft power? Who cares! And so on.

And finally, the president is presumably fine with the story because Wiles made her deference to him clear:

“There have been a couple of times where I’ve been outvoted,” Wiles said. “And if there’s a tie, he wins.”

As did Vance:

Vance described Wiles’s approach to the chief’s job. “There is this idea that people have that I think was very common in the first administration,” he told me, “that their objective was to control the president or influence the president, or even manipulate the president because they had to in order to serve the national interest. Susie just takes the diametrically opposite viewpoint, which is that she’s a facilitator, that the American people have elected Donald Trump. And her job is to actually facilitate his vision and to make his vision come to life.”

Sure, she said he doesn't understand the details of what his administration is doing. On USAID:

“The president doesn’t know and never will,” she told me. “He doesn’t know the details of these smallish agencies.”

But Trump is proud of his ignorance. He believes he has such a superior brain that he makes better decisions without knowing what he's talking about than other presidents have made after learning the facts.

So, sadly, the White House is shrugging this off. The voters Trump and his people care about will be unfazed. The rest of us are horrified, but the White House doesn't care what we think and never will.