Thursday, January 21, 2021

THE EMPTY BOASTS GAP

In his latest New York Times column, Ezra Klein makes some important points: If Democrats want to avoid losing their slim House and Senate majorities in the next midterm cycle, they need to do big, noticeable things that make people's lives better -- and that will probably require them to nuke the filibuster in the Senate.

But this gives me pause:
Among the many tributaries flowing into Trumpism, one in particular has gone dangerously overlooked. In their book “Presidents, Populism and the Crisis of Democracy,” the political scientists William Howell and Terry Moe write that “populists don’t just feed on socioeconomic discontent. They feed on ineffective government — and their great appeal is that they claim to replace it with a government that is effective through their own autocratic power.”

Donald Trump was this kind of populist. Democrats mocked his “I alone can fix it” message for its braggadocio and feared its authoritarianism, but they did not take seriously the deep soil in which it was rooted: The American system of governance is leaving too many Americans to despair and misery, too many problems unsolved, too many people disillusioned. It is captured by corporations and paralyzed by archaic rules. It is failing, and too many Democrats treat its failures as regrettable inevitabilities rather than a true crisis.
Except that Trump didn't replaced ineffective government with effective government. That's become obvious to most of us during the pandemic -- though not to the 74 million people who voted for Trump. They think he did a good job managing the virus. They think he built the wall. (He built a small part of it.) They think he brought coal back and manufacturing jobs back. (He didn't.) They think he was personally responsible for a rip-roaring economy. (It was a continuation of the Obama economy.)

Klein makes a point about President Obama's policies being slow to deliver benefits (Obamacare) or delivering them so subtly that voters didn't notice:
The Obama administration believed that if you got the policy right, the politics would follow. That led, occasionally, to policies that almost entirely abandoned politics, so deep ran the faith in clever design. The Making Work Pay tax credit, which was a centerpiece of the Recovery Act, was constructed to be invisible — the Obama administration, working off new research in behavioral economics, believed Americans would be more likely to spend a windfall that they didn’t know they got. “When all was said and done, only around 10 percent of people who received benefits knew they had received something from the government,” says Suzanne Mettler, a political scientist at Cornell. You don’t get re-elected for things voters don’t know you did.
Klein is right -- you don’t get re-elected for things voters don’t know you did. But Trump almost got re-elected for things he didn't do but his voters thought he did.

And that isn't just because Trump is an unusually shameless braggart. George W. Bush got reelected in 2004 for "keeping America safe" after being asleep at the switch in the months leading up to the worst terrorist attack ever on U.S. soil. He also got reelected for his consduct of the war -- which was clearly a diaster by 2004.

Biden isn't likely to do anything of the sort by 2022 or 2024. Even highly charismatic Democratic presidents -- Obama, Clinton -- don't pound their chests and tell you they solved all your problems when they didn't. Republicans are much better at this, and have a much more effective propaganda machine to reinforce their messaging.

That puts Democrats at a disadvantage. They need to deliver results because they won't simply insist that they already delivered them.

GUY PROPOSING A DONALD TRUMP HIGHWAY CHECKS ALL THE BOXES: GUN NUT, COVID DENIALIST, QANON FAN

And so it begins. This is from a Florida state legislator:



That would be this Anthony Sabatini:



Sabatini is known in Florida for filing a lot of lawsuits against pandemic public health measures, as the Florida Phoenix noted in September:
Sabatini has sustained at least seven losses in court and a judicial warning from 2nd Circuit Judge David Frank that he risks being sanctioned for filing “frivolous lawsuits” against local mask mandates. Amid the string of losses, Sabatini announced with a flourish Friday that Gov. Ron DeSantis by executive order had just suspended fines and penalties issued to enforce mask orders.

“ATTENTION FLORIDA BUSINESSES: YOU NO LONGER HAVE TO COMPLY WITH THE PETTY DEMANDS OF POWER HUNGRY LOCAL GOVERNMENT TYRANTS—IGNORE THEM COMPLETELY,” Sabatini wrote in all caps on his “VoteSabatini” Facebook page.

Actually, DeSantis’ suspension of fines and penalties applies to “individuals” and does not mention businesses, as stated in Executive Order 20-244, but Sabatini didn’t cite the order in his post. Several local governments interpreted the order to mean they may continue to require businesses to make employees and customers wear masks.
Sabatini is now fighting mandatory vaccination (even though no one's actually proposing it). As the right-wing site Major League Liberty USA ever-so-subtly puts it:
... he is now focusing on the next potential violation of the citizenry during this pandemic; the state forced vaccination. With many “experts” and globalist anti-freedom forces pushing the idea of mandatory vaccinations and tracking, including the Chinese President who so horribly failed his nation and entire world with his bungled handling of the initial outbreak, Sabatini seeks to make it the law of the land in Florida that the government cannot legally force Coronavirus vaccinations....
“The government should never have the ability to restrain a person and force them to take a vaccine—it should always remain an individual choice. This is is the most dangerous from of Big Government. The more we can remove government from our personal healthcare decisions, the better.”
And, naturally, Sabatini gave a shout-out to QAnon a few months ago, although the tweet is now deleted.



The Washington Post's Antonia Noori Farzan notes that efforts to rename things after Trump haven't gotten very far:
In 2019, one Republican lawmaker in Oklahoma tried to rename a stretch of old U.S. Route 66 after Trump but was shut down by members of his own party. Some worried that doing so would discourage tourists, while others objected to changing the name of one of the country’s most iconic roads. An attempt to place Trump’s name on a more obscure highway in the Oklahoma Panhandle last year was also unsuccessful.

South Carolina’s Republican-dominated legislature, too, rejected a bill to name a highway interchange after Trump in 2020. Some conservative lawmakers expressed reluctance about naming roads after living people, while another noted that there was a competing proposal to name the interchange after former president Barack Obama and dismissed both bills as “a big political game.”
But as soon as the Biden administration has the slightest stumble, you'll hear calls for honoring Trump this way. You'll also start seeing a Trump version of this:



It seems unimaginable now, but it'll happen.

Wednesday, January 20, 2021

STICK WITH PURE RAGE

Joe Biden is now the president of the United States, and I'm reading a lot of stories like this:
As Biden was sworn in, ... the mass arrests that QAnon believers call “The Storm,” stubbornly refused to happen. Trump really did appear to have left office, rather than springing the sly trap as they had all hoped. The Democrats really did have control of the White House and both chambers of Congress.

The tens of thousands of National Guard soldiers QAnon believers thought would help Trump retake Washington instead appeared to be there for a more obvious purpose: protecting the city from the same crazed QAnon believers who had violently attacked the Capitol two weeks earlier.

“I’m about to puke,” one QAnon fan watching Biden take the oath of office wrote....

“Trump fooled us,” complained one Telegram commenter.

“All my family and co-workers think I’m crazy,” wrote another.

“I feel stupid,” wrote a third.

Even major QAnon boosters saw their faith in the bizarre conspiracy theory shaken on Monday. QAnon booster Roy Davis co-authored a bestselling book promoting QAnon under the alias “Captain Roy,” even getting his sports car painted with a giant, blazing “Q” on the hood.

... as Biden’s new title became official, Davis said he was ready to move on from Q—something his doctor has long urged him to do anyway.

“We misinterpreted it,” Davis said. “Maybe we should have done something different.”
Apart from gun and abortion absolutism, both of which appeal to a certain segment of the population, Republicans have nothing to offer ordinary voters. So they find ways to rally voters that have nothing to do with policy. QAnon became one of those ways.

But if you're promising mass arrests of all your voters' enemies, it's likely to be somewhat of a problem if you can't deliver. It appears that many QAnoners are disillusioned now. The GOP has probably lost many of these voters.

Simply encouraging voters to hate Democrats and their allies is a strategy that's more likely to lead to a durable allegiance to the GOP. If you follow this strategy, you don't have to promise anything -- you just have to treat rage as the reward.

At Breitbart, there are headlines such as "Joe Biden’s Amnesty Bill Elevates Fortune 500, Migrants, but Sidelines Americans" and "Hollywood Celebs Fawn over Biden, Harris During Inauguration: ‘Democracy Exhales,’ ‘I’m Hyperventilating With Joy.’" At Gateway Pundit, there's "Biden Has Maybe 2,000 Attendees at Inauguration — and 25,000 Military — Just Like They Do in Lawless Banana Republics" and a story referring to "the 'Hunger Games' inaugural" (apparently a reference to Lady Gaga's clothes and hair).

See? No promise of a payoff -- just pure resentment.

Donald Trump understood that. As it turned out, it didn't matter whether he brought all the coal jobs back (he didn't) or got the wall completely built (he didn't do that either, and he certainly didn't get Mexico to pay for it). The resentment was everything.

Unfortunately for Republicans, it wasn't enough to get him reelected. But the resentniks will stick around, and will feed off all the anger Brietbart and GP and Josh Hawley and the rest inspire. But the QAnoners might never come back.

SIRI, SHOW ME THE STUPIDEST GOTCHA OF ALL TIME

In a Washington Free Beacon piece labeled "Satire," Andrew Stiles writes:
HISTORIC: Joe Biden to Be Sworn In on Jeffrey Epstein’s Birthday

Coincidence? The late Democratic pedophile would have been 68


Joe Biden will be sworn in as the 46th president of the United States on Wednesday....

In what may or may not be a coincidence, the date of the inauguration, Jan. 20, happens to be the birth date of Jeffrey Epstein, the Democratic donor and billionaire pedophile who died under suspicious circumstances in 2019. He would have been 68.

Epstein committed "suicide" in his cell following his arrest on sex trafficking charges. The arrest did not come as a surprise, given that his perverted lifestyle was widely known among his many powerful friends in the media, higher education, and the Democratic Party.
Um....


... Epstein's arrest in 2019 was prompted in large part by a local newspaper's reporting on President Donald Trump's nominee for labor secretary, Alex Acosta. If Hillary Clinton wasn't such an unlikable human being, Trump never would have become president, and Epstein almost certainly would have continued to commit crimes.
Yes, there was renewed scrutiny of Epstein because Trump nominated a guy to the Cabinet who inspired headlines such as "US Attorney Alex Acosta Showed 'Poor Judgment' When Giving Jeffrey Epstein State-Based Plea Deal in 2008: DOJ." See, it was a good thing Trump nominated an Epstein enabler!
Prominent Democratic politicians have a history of connecting their achievements to the birthdays of depraved individuals....
I'll stop there.

Stiles knows that we always inaugurate presidents on January 20, right? He knows that Donald Trump was inaugurated on January 20, 2017 -- right? And if Stiles had had his wish, Trump would be the one inaugurated today -- Stiles knows that, doesn't he?

Epstein's date of birth was January 20, 1953. On that day, Republican Dwight Eisenhower was sworn in as president for the first time.

Coincidence? I think not.

#PEDOIKE

#IKELIKESADRENOCHROME

Tuesday, January 19, 2021

THEY THINK WE'RE GOING TO PUT THEM IN CAMPS

President-Elect Joe Biden intends to ask the Federal Emergency Management Agency to help set up COVID-19 vaccination centers. Florida governor Ron DeSantis, who's an ambitious Republican and thus is not only required to denounce everything Biden does but must also make it seem sinister and apocalyptic, has decided that "vaccination centers" is not the correct term.
During a news conference in Cape Coral on Tuesday, DeSantis said Biden’s plan to use federal disaster agency and the National Guard to build COVID-19 vaccine clinics across the country would be a “big mistake.”

“I saw some of this stuff Biden’s putting out, that he’s going to create these FEMA camps, I can tell you, that’s not necessary in Florida,” he said....

“Just think about it: If you come in and tell FEMA to create some type of camp, how long is that going to take?” DeSantis said. “And then are you going to divert vaccines from my efforts here?”
DeSantis knows exactly what he's doing when he uses the expression "FEMA camps." The notion that FEMA might set up detention or extermination camps in America has been widespread for years, and the people most likely to believe it are right-wingers. The Southern Poverty Law Center wrote about this in 2010:
FEMA camp stories have been around a long time. Almost three decades ago, back in 1982, a newsletter of the extreme-right and anti-Semitic Posse Comitatus warned that “hardcore Patriots” would be imprisoned in FEMA detention camps. Some versions during the militia heyday of the 1990s had urban street gangs like the Bloods and the Crips, rather than domestic or foreign troops, rounding up antigovernment patriots.

Conspiracy theorists often point to a front-page story in The Miami Herald back in 1987 as proof that, in the words of one of them, “FEMA is the executive arm of the coming police state and thus will head up all operations.” The story reported that between 1982 and 1984, Marine Lt. Col. Oliver North had helped draft a secret contingency plan to suspend the Constitution in the event of a national crisis, such as nuclear war, violent and widespread domestic dissent, or national opposition to a U.S. military invasion abroad....

The plan was written for President Ronald Reagan in case he ever wanted to take such action. The newspaper also obtained a copy of a FEMA official’s 1982 memo that it reported was similar to a paper then-FEMA director Louis Guiffrida had written 12 years earlier. In the 1970 document, Guiffrida reportedly advocated martial law in case of a national uprising by black militants and the transferring of at least 21 million “American Negroes” to “assembly centers or relocations camps.”
Reagan was president in 1982. Richard Nixon was president in 1970. So, naturally, this is seen a liberal plot.

Meanwhile, Fox News -- presumably trying to get back in the game after Newsmax TV and One America News Network stole its thunder -- has been talking about reeducation camps.
Fox News dedicated multiple segments on Monday and Tuesday to a new conspiracy theory, baselessly floating the false idea that Democrats, "big tech," and the news media are pushing for "reeducation camps" or forms of "reprogramming" in the wake of the Jan. 6 insurrection on Capitol Hill.

"Is the plan of Couric and others to cram everyone into a digital reeducation camp, or are they gonna set up a concentration camp like that for the Uighur Muslims in communist China to make sure everyone gets reeducated and deprogrammed?" co-host Dagen McDowell asked former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee on the 12 p.m. hour of "Outnumbered."
That's in response to an appearance by Katie Couric on Bill Maher's HBO show.
"What do you do about people who are in the government who don't believe in our way of government?" Maher ... asked Couric in an exchange that was not shown on Fox.

"I mean, it's really bizarre, isn't it, when you think about how AWOL so many of these members of Congress have gotten," Couric said in the clip shown on "Outnumbered," referring to Republican lawmakers who still dispute the results of the 2020 election along with President Trump.

"But I also think some of them are believing the garbage they are being fed 24/7 on the internet, by their constituents, and they've bought into this big lie," Couric said. "And the question is, how are we going to really almost deprogram these people who have signed up for the cult of Trump?"
Yes, they think we literally intend to round them up and force them to recant. And:
Primetime host Sean Hannity also ran a segment on the same theme on Monday night, specifically using the term "reeducation camps."

They're not mentioning FEMA on Fox, but I'm seeing FEMA mentioned on Twitter in response to this story:
A dozen members of the National Guard have been removed from inauguration duty as the federal government screens troops involved for security concerns, senior U.S. defense officials said Tuesday....

The troops include at least two with possible sympathies for anti-government groups, said two U.S. officials, speaking on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue. Ten were removed for reasons that defense officials declined to detail but said didn’t involve extremism....

Army Gen. Daniel Hokanson, the chief of the National Guard Bureau, declined to provide specifics about the troops alleged to have expressed common cause with anti-government groups but said they had made “inappropriate comments.” One of them was flagged because of concern within his unit, while the other was reported anonymously, defense officials said....

The 12 troops represent a tiny fraction of the 25,000 guardsmen deployed in Washington for the inauguration....
So 25,000 Guard members are being deployed, and a whopping two of them have been accused of anti-government sympathies -- not conservatism. But on Twitter, that's fascism:


See? These folks don't need Trump. They're going to be like this with or without him for the foreseeable future.

YES, RED AMERICA WILL STILL NAME SCHOOLS AFTER TRUMP

Jonathan Chait writes:
[The] repudiation I predicted is at hand. Trump has lost the popular vote twice, and been impeached as many times. His approval ratings have sunk to around 30 percent, half the level of where Obama’s stood when he left office. His Republican partners are already whispering they were privately against him all along. His anathematization by social media, corporate America, and other mainstream institutions is a preview of the place he will occupy in the popular imagination. He will join the likes of Andrew Johnson, Joe McCarthy, and George Wallace as an enemy of the civic creed. A century from now, Obama’s name — not Trump’s — will adorn schools, roads, and plazas.
Trump's approval ratings haven't "sunk to around 30 percent" -- he's at 39.4% in the Real Clear Politics polling average, and at 38.3% at FiveThirtyEight. He's doing worse in some polls (Gallup, Pew, Quinnipiac), but his approval is still above 40% according to others (Suffolk, NBC/Wall Street Journal). In the FiveThirtyEight average, Trump's 38.3% is a lot lower than Barack Obama's 51.1%, but it isn't "half the level."

Chait is right about Obama's legacy -- his name "will adorn schools, roads, and plazas." But so will Trump's. We know this because the events of January 6 haven't dampened the right's extremism.

In Wyoming, the Republican Party in one county has voted unanimously to censure Liz Cheney, the state's only member of the House, for voting to impeach Trump, while the state GOP chair just appeared on Steve Bannon's podcast and expressed interest in secession, citing secession moves by some Texas Republicans.
Earlier this month, Texas Republican Rep. Kyle Biedermann announced he would be sponsoring a bill in that Legislature’s 2021 session to put the question of secession to voters this fall, a step that comes roughly four years after the Texas Nationalist Movement came within two votes of adding Texas independence language to the state’s Republican platform.
In Michigan, the state GOP
wants to replace the GOP member of the Board of State Canvassers who cast the pivotal vote to certify election results in favor of Democratic President-elect Joe Biden....

His term ends on Jan. 31. Instead of renominating him for a four-year term, the Michigan Republican Party has proposed three well-know activists to take his spot, according to a letter obtained by The Detroit News. Among them is Linda Lee Tarver, who was involved in a lawsuit that sought to have the GOP-controlled Legislature intervene in the results showing Democratic President-elect Joe Biden won.
And then there's the Arizona GOP.
... when the party leadership meets this weekend, the most pressing items on the agenda will be censuring three moderate Republicans who remain widely popular in Arizona ... Cindy McCain, the widow of the Senator John McCain; former Senator Jeff Flake and Gov. Doug Ducey.
Cindy McCain endorsed Joe Biden. Jeff Flake criticized Trump. Doug Ducey wouldn't intervene to reverse Trump's loss in the 2020 election. This has nothing to do with whether they're "moderate."

Here's the text of the censure resolution for Cindy McCain:
WHEREAS, Cindy Hensley McCain, the wife of the late Arizona US Senator John McCain, has supported leftist causes such as gay marriage, growth of the administrative state, and others that run counter to Republican values, a Republican form of government, and the US Constitution;

WHEREAS, Cindy McCain has failed to support Conservative Republican candidates such as President Trump;

WHEREAS, Cindy McCain has supported globalist policies and candidates, including Democrats such as Joe Biden, in direct opposition to Republican values, the interests of the American people, and the Constitution of the United States;

WHEREAS, Cindy McCain has condemned President Trump for his criticism of her husband and erroneously placed behaviors over actual presidential results; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Arizona Republican Party members meeting at their January 23, 2021 Meeting in Phoenix, Arizona, hereby object to Cindy McCain being a member of the Republican Party and officially censure her;

FURTHER, the Republican Party in the State of Arizona agrees to dissolve any connections whatsoever to Cindy McCain.
If the Capitol riot hasn't inspired Republican officials to rethink these moves, why would GOP-dominated locales hesitate to name schools, roads, and plazas after Trump? They'll do it largely because it offends the rest of us.

Think of the battle against Trumpism as roughly analogous to the Iraq War. We've taken Baghdad. Saddam is out of power. But it's way too early for the MISSION ACCOMPLISHED banner.

Monday, January 18, 2021

THEY PROBABLY CAN'T MEMORY-HOLE TRUMP, BUT THEY PROBABLY WON'T NEED TO

The Atlantic's McKay Coppins believes that the Republican Party will develop amnesia about the Trump presidency.
How will the GOP recover from the complicity and corruption of the Trump era? To many Republicans, the answer is simple: Pretend it never happened.

“We’re about to see a whole political party do a large-scale version of ‘New phone, who dis?’” says Sarah Isgur, a former top spokesperson for the Trump Justice Department. “It will be like that boyfriend you should never have dated—the mistake that shall not be mentioned.”

... the narrative now forming in some GOP circles presents Trump as a secondary figure who presided over an array of important accomplishments thanks to the wisdom and guidance of the Republicans in his orbit. In these accounts, Trump’s race-baiting, corruption, and cruel immigration policies—not to mention his attempts to overturn an election—are treated as minor subplots, rather than defining features.
Jonathan Last of The Bulwark doesn't buy it.
... it’s a theory that rests on the idea that institutional power trumps popular power. It presupposes that Republican voters are going to do what they’re told and revert back to the benign electorate that nominated Mitt Romney and John McCain and pushed John Boehner into the speaker’s chair.

I would argue that for both structural and psychological reasons, this dynamic no longer exists and for the foreseeable future, popular power matters a good deal more than institutional power in the GOP.

... the Republican party has conditioned voters to value affect and mien over policy. The promise of the Republican party to its base voters is not “we can pass legislation to make your life better.” It is, “We will make the people you hate angry.”
Even after January 6, I'm inclined to believe that Last is closer to the truth than Coppins is. But both of them overlook the fact that the Republican Party won't be (re-)branding itself in a vacuum.

The GOP narrative in 2021 and beyond won't be primarily about Trump -- it will be primarily about Joe Biden ... and Kamala Harris, and Nancy Pelosi, and Chuck Schumer, and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

It will be about tax increases (which will be described as increases on everybody even if they aren't). It will be about mask mandates and contact tracing. (Biden intends to significantly improve America's ability to trace the contacts of COVID-infected people, and Republicans will describe this as more totalitarian than the Oceania government in 1984.) It will be about "socialism." It will be about "Obamagate" (whatever the hell that is) and any new scandals the GOP can gin up involving Hunter Biden. It will be about smearing Harris and Pelosi and Schumer as evil forces who will destroy America as we know it unless they're constrained.

In other words, in a less Trumpian way, the GOP is going to make the people GOP voters hate angry. It's going to make GOP voters angry at the people they hate. In other words, it;s going to do what Trump did, but less crudely.

Remember, in 2009 the GOP didn't try to rebuild the reputation of George W. Bush. Instead, the Tea Party and the right-wing media attacked Barack Obama on every possible front. And that's exactly what Republicans did in 1993 -- the narrative was about Whitewater and other nothingburger Clinton scandals, which, along with the usual "make America ungovernable" Republican tactics in Congress, was enough, before Monica Lewinsky, to give the GOP control of the House and Senate after the 1994 midterms.

When Republicans do this to Joe Biden, it won't matter whether Trump is involved or not, because we'll no longer be judging him -- we'll be judging Biden and the Democrats, and the GOP will want us to believe they're proven failures.

(I'm sure Trump will be involved in this.)

"Mainstream" Republicans can pretend Trump was nothing more than a bad dream by focusing on the Failed, Scandalous Biden Presidency, all while ignoring Trump, who'll be doing ... exactly the same thing.

THE CAPITOL RIOTER WHO RUNS COWBOYS FOR TRUMP IS -- OF COURSE -- A RACIST AND COVID TRUTHER WHO ROUTINELY MAKES VIOLENT THREATS

A New Mexico county commissioner who took part in the January 6 Capitol riot has been arrested after he vowed to return to the Capitol for Joe Biden's inaugural carrying guns.
Couy Griffin, the founder of the "Cowboys for Trump" organization, has been arrested by the FBI after he vowed to return to the United States Capitol building carrying guns.

CBS News reports that Griffin was charged with illegally trespassing in the Capitol building during the infamous January 6th pro-Trump riots that resulted in the deaths of five people.

Griffin, who also serves as a Republican commissioner for Otero County, New Mexico, vowed last week that he would attend President-elect Joe Biden's inauguration while packing heat.

"I'm gonna be there on January 20th... and I'm gonna take a stand for our country and for our freedoms," Griffin said during an Otero County Board of Commissioners meeting. "I'm gonna leave either tonight or tomorrow. I've got a .357 Henry Big Boy rifle lever action that I've got in the trunk of my car and I've got a .357 single action revolver, the Colt Ruger Vaquero that I'll have underneath the front seat on my right side and I will embrace my Second Amendment."
Prior to this, Griffin was notorious in New Mexico for racist remarks:

GRIFFIN: ... They want to talk about playing a Black national anthem before football games? I got a better idea. Why don't you go back to Africa and form your own football teams over in Africa and you can play on an old beat-out dirt lot, and you can play your Black national anthem there. How about that?
GRIFFIN: If you want to think that Whites are gonna be your slaves, and that all Whites are evil and the Whites are bad, then move, move -- and if you want to call yourself an African, then move back to Africa if that's what pleases you. That's not a racist thing to say if you're not happy here and you call yourself an African, or an Ecuadorian, or a Mexican, or a Chinaman, a Chinese, or whatever....
Griffin was banned from Mescalero Apache land last year in response to a couple of his videos, in one of which he seemed to be rooting for Nancy Pelosi's death.
The Mescalero Apache Tribe announced via its Facebook page that District 2 Otero County Commissioner Couy Griffin has been banned from the Mescalero Apache Indian Reservation.

The tribe said its decision was made after reviewing two videos filmed on tribal land and disseminated by Griffin via the Cowboys for Trump Facebook page....

[The] second video posted online Sept. 20 shows Griffin receiving a Mescalero blessing ceremony. [Tribal president Gabe] Aguilar criticized Griffin’s behavior in the video, saying such ceremonies are not meant to be “comical.”

... In the video, Griffin is shown laughing. Off screen, a second person comments that Griffin should “go after some dead Democrats ... they can’t do nothing to you now.” Griffin answered, “That’s right ... bring it on, Nancy Pelosi.”
The second person's comments might have been an allusion to an earlier Griffin video:
In a video posted Tuesday on social media, Otero County Commissioner Couy Griffin said he wished for the Democratic Party to die because it was anti-American and opposed to President Donald Trump.

“I’ve come to a place where I’ve come to the conclusion that the only good Democrat is a dead Democrat,” Griffin said in a video on the Cowboys for Trump Facebook and Twitter pages. The crowd at an unknown event began to cheer.

“I don’t say that in the physical sense, and I can already see where the videos getting edited where it says I want to go murder Democrats. No,” Griffin continued. “I say that in the political sense because the Democrat agenda and policy is anti-American right now.”
And that's mild compared to some of Griffin's other pronouncements:
Griffin: “I Don’t Care If You Are A Governor, You Can Still Swing At The End Of A Rope.” If there’s political leaders such as governors...y’all better start paying real close attention, because we’re moving to you. And you better make sure that you haven’t been doing anything where you would be guilty of the charge of treason, because I don’t care if you are a governor, you can still swing at the end of a rope.” 4/20/20

Griffin Continued To Call For The Death Penalty For “Treasonous” Politicians Who Are Undermining The President. “If we have political leaders in our country today... that are guilty of treason, which is to directly undermine the United States of America...such things like the Mueller Report... all this fake stuff that was constructed to try to destroy our president and in turn bring our nation down in my opinion is treason in its truest form. Treason is punishable by death.” 4/20/20

Griffin Said Democrats Are Guilty Of Treason, Which He Referred To As “A Hanging Offense.” “They’re gonna milk this coronavirus deal as long as they possibly can...Maybe they’re doing it because some of them might be guilty of treason, and treasons a hanging offense. I don’t know why they’re doing it, but they’re doing it, and we can’t let them win. We’ve gotta fight back; we’ve gotta push back.” 4/26/20

Griffin On Twitter: “There Will Come A Day When Politics Won’t Be Able To Hide Treasonous Acts. Hang Em High Mr. President!” 5/10/20

... Griffin Promoted A Possible Civil War Between Mask Wearers And Non-mask Wearers. “It might be a lead up to a civil war and if we do have a civil war over this, maybe that’s gonna be the uniforms. Maybe one of the uniforms will have masks on and the other ones won’t.” 5/3/20

Griffin Promoted on Facebook a Potential Civil War Between the NM State Police And County Sheriffs. “This “pandemic” could lead us to a civil war! We must stand behind our County Sheriffs and guard our Constitution at any cost! The State Police and his administration are appointed. Our County Sheriffs are elected. Our Founding Fathers were brilliant visionaries! They gave us a threshold to stand on. It is time to stand!” 4/30/20
Yes, of course Griffin is a COVID crackpot. This is from July:
Couy Griffin, a Republican commissioner for Otero County, New Mexico, is now encouraging his supporters to stop wearing face masks to prevent the spread of the novel coronavirus.

Griffin ... posted a video on Twitter this week in which he falsely claimed that wearing face masks weakens human immune systems.

"The longer you wear a mask, the weaker your immune system will be and the more susceptible you'll be to disease," said Griffin, who added that it's good for people to "get exposed" to viruses and bacteria so their immune systems strengthen.
Otero County is, like most of New Mexico, in what the state considers a red zone; it has a test positivity rate of 10.58%.

The New Mexico Republican Party has now disavowed Griffin.
The Republican Party of New Mexico released a statement by Party Chairman Steve Pearce distancing themselves from Republican Otero County Commissioner Couy Griffin and his organization Cowboys for Trump last week.

“Mr. Griffin does not represent the Republican Party of New Mexico nor does he speak for the party. RPNM does not endorse or condone the statements made by Cowboys for Trump Founder Couy Griffin," Republican Party of New Mexico Chairman Steve Pearce said.

"RPNM condemns violence and any threats of violence against any person or group. What happened in Washington was wrong and was a stain on our great democracy.”
That should have happened a long time ago, Steve.

Sunday, January 17, 2021

WATCH THE GOP DISINFORMATION MACHINE AT WORK

On Friday, writing for David Horowitz's FrontPage Magazine, Daniel Greenfield blamed the Capitol riot on Nancy Pelosi.
The Capitol Hill Riot Was Pelosi’s Fault, Not Trump’s

... it wasn’t the White House’s job to protect Congress. That’s why Congress has a force of 2,300 people and a $460 million budget with just one job to do.

The question of why it failed at that job ought to be directed to Pelosi and congressional leaders.

The Capitol riot is Pelosi’s disaster and she’s making the most of it by blaming it on everyone else. Her private police force had the resources and the people to keep out the Visigoths, never mind a few hundred people, and instead turned what should have been a riot into a disaster.
This followed a similar piece from Ukrainegate disinformationist John Solomon at his Just the News site.
The FBI admitted Tuesday it received information ahead of the Jan. 6 tragedy suggesting some participants were planning a "war" on the Capitol, including killing officers and distributing maps of the complex. It alerted Washington D.C. law enforcement through the joint terrorism task force alert system. It also "disrupted" the travel plans of some of the suspected trouble-makers....

The New York Police Department is reported to have given the Capitol Police similar intelligence warnings of impending violence....

What did House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the other leaders in Congress know — and when did they know it — about the possibility for violence and the Pentagon's pre-attack offer to send National Guardsmen to reinforce the Capitol Police?
And now Lindsey Graham takes this idea mainstream:

GRAHAM: To see people come and take over the Capitol, the House and the Senate, beat officers, defile the seat of government, how in the hell could that happen? Where was Nancy Pelosi? It's her job to provide Capitol security.
No, it's not her job. The Capitol Police force isn't Nancy Pelosi's personal fiefdom. The force is overseen by both houses of Congress.
The U.S. Capitol Police is an odd entity: Unlike other federal law enforcement agencies, which are part of the executive branch, it is overseen directly by Congress.... The department is overseen by a small executive board made up of the Senate and House sergeants at arms and the architect of the Capitol, and it receives broad instructions and funding from the Senate Committee on Rules and Administration, the Committee on House Administration, and the Senate and House appropriations subcommittees that deal with the legislative branch.
Which means that if Congress is at fault for the force's failings on January 6, then the blame lies as much with Mitch McConnell as much as it does with Pelosi.

But Graham never mentions McConnell's name. Nor does Greenfield. Nor does Solomon. They portray the riot as all Pelosi's fault.

Republicans never stop lying. And the lies work. Your right-wing relatives will be blaming Pelosi for the riot soon, if they aren't doing so already.

HEY TRUTH, PUT ON YOUR DAMN BOOTS

Jonathan Swift didn't exactly say that a lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is still putting on its boots, but it's an important warning about how false beliefs spread, and we've seen it embodied in the response to the Donald Trump's stolen-election lie. Margaret Sullivan is absolutely right about this:
Too often, even the most credible journalists who are trying to cover the disastrous effects of the Big Lie explain it by sprinkling phrases into their reporting like “baseless claims” or “without evidence” — and seem to expect them to do all the work.

But that’s simply ineffective. “People don’t notice this boilerplate language after a while,” Rosenstiel said, “or even begin to bristle at it.”

What’s the alternative? Journalists should take the time — even in an ordinary news story or brief broadcast segment — to be more specific. Let’s offer a few sentences that give detail on why the claims are baseless and how they’ve been debunked.

The second paragraph of this January national security report in The Washington Post does just that: “By mid-December, President Trump’s fraudulent claims of a rigged election were failing in humiliating fashion. Lawsuits were being laughed out of courts. State officials, including Republicans, were refusing to bend to his will and alter the vote. And in a seemingly decisive blow on Dec. 14, the electoral college certified the win for Joe Biden.”

That’s far better than a mere nod to “baseless claims.” As Rosenstiel put it: “Engage in verification and explanation, not labeling.”
I'd go further. We need detailed recaps of exactly what happened to Trump's case in courts and in election officials' offices. Tell us what the Trump team claimed and then what it was actually willing to put in legal filings, which often omitted the very claims Trump's people were making in public pronouncements. Point out which claims Trump's people have never backed up with evidence, and which ones they've backed up with evidence that fell apart under scrutiny. Recount how many legal cases the Trump team has lost, and give us quotes from the decisions that make clear why the cases were rejected. Tell us why election officials believe the votes were legitimate and were counted fairly, and why the claims in a million Facebook posts are deceitful. Tell us the whole story as if we don't know it -- because, in fact, most Americans don't.

On TV, take your time -- make it an hour-long special if necessary (but post bite-size highlights on social media). Online, newspapers and magazines should make the story thorough but visually appealing -- as you scroll, you'll scroll past highlights from withering dismissals by multiple judges.

Of course, none of this will persuade GOP voters. But it might persuade some of their neighbors. It will make the case to the persuadable that the answer to the question "Did Joe Biden steal the election" isn't "No," it's "Hell no," and that believers in the legitimacy of the election have nothing to hide.

Yes, as Sullivan says, there should be a capsule rebuttal of the Trump case in every story that mentions his allegations. But we need more.

Saturday, January 16, 2021

NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCES ARE FOR OTHER PEOPLE

In The Atlantic earlier this week, David Frum wrote:
At least since the election of Barack Obama in 2008, the conservative world has become a place of ever more extreme language, ever more widely distanced from real-world events. Conservative talkers would say things like Obama “is literally at war with the American people,” and then be greatly shocked and offended that anyone would connect their words to the growth of extremist violence. The words did not mean anything to the cynics who spoke them, and so they found it difficult to imagine that the words might mean anything to those who heard them.
I don't know if Madison Cawthorn, the young congressman from North Carolina who tweeted "Cry more, lib," when he won his election in November, is a cynic, but he seems shocked and offended that anyone would connect his inflammatory Trumpist words to the recent violence in Washington. New York magazine's Olivia Nuzzi writes:
Madison Cawthorn has a vision of a January 6 that did not happen. One in which he does the noble thing for career and country. He uses his MAGA celebrity for good. He transforms from shitposter to statesman. And he emerges from the U.S. Capitol as America’s savior.

Ten days into the 25-year-old’s first term as the youngest member of the House of Representatives, ... the North Carolina Republican was in his quarters at the Cannon House Office Building talking about what-ifs and reliving an already historic sequence of events — in which he gave a speech to some people and then those people stormed the Capitol to overturn the results of the election, kill a police officer, and call for the execution of the vice-president.

“Literally,” Cawthorn said, “I ... I ... I ...”

... his buddy turned campaign manager turned senior aide Blake Harp sat folded on the black leather couch upon which Cawthorn has been sleeping since arriving in Washington. Harp was focused on his phone. Cawthorn kept staring in his direction, as if searching for the right words. Harp continued to type.

“In hindsight,” Cawthorn went on, “you know, I wish I could’ve ... uhh ... if I could, you know ... I probably would’ve ... obviously ... knowing what happened later in the day ... I wish I would’ve been like, ‘Just so you know, we are peaceful protesters.’”
I don't think Madison Cawthorn is a cynic. I think all the talk about a stolen election genuinely means something to him -- either he sincerely believes the conspiracy theories or he believes that Joe Biden won legitimately, but the Democratic Party is such a clear and present danger to the American people that Biden's inauguration is something any decent person should try to prevent by any means necessary, like preventing a terrorist attack.

I don't think the Republican cynics who said Obama was literally at war with the American people thought the people who heard them were equally cynical. I think they were members of the politcal elite who, as a rule, believe nothing truly terrible can result from their words and deeds because, generally speaking, nothing truly terrible ever seems to happen to them.

You can't blame them, really. Since the Reagan era, Republicans (with some Democratic help) have drastcally reduced the economic security of the middle class, put Americans through deep recessions, addicted millions to opiates ... and suffered no consequences. The economic elite are still comfortably awash in money. The Republican Party still wins lots of elections. America hasn't burned.

Madison Cawthorn actually knows calamity -- a car accident in his teens put him in a wheelchair -- but he grew up economically comfortable and a high school hero, and he's now one of the fastest-rising stars in the GOP, so life is good, and, like other GOP elitists, he seems to have believed that there could be no negative consequences for the country if he and others repeatedly cried "Fraud!" in response to an election result certified by all fifty states and multiple courts.

We know that the right-wing cynics believed this -- “What is the downside for humoring him for this little bit of time?" a senior GOP official said in November in response to Trump's talk of a stolen election.

But they always think this way. They've long believed that nothing bad will happen to them personally if their climate denialism leads to a hotter, stormier planet. They've shrugged off the risks to themselves of a gun-drenched country. They never felt personally endangered by Fox News, talk radio, the Tea Party, or the election of Donald Trump. They think they can party mask-free and never die of COVID.

Under right-wing control, life is good -- for right-wingers. Negative consequences are for other people. That's the GOP worldview.

Friday, January 15, 2021

SPIKING THE FOOTBALL ON THE 40-YARD LINE (updated)

I like the fact that the GOP is now the party seen by Beltway insiders as "in disarray," but it's way too early to write something like this Axios post by Jim VandeHei:
The post-Trump GOP, gutted

Republicans will emerge from the Trump era gutted financially, institutionally and structurally....

* They lost their congressional power.
Yes, but in 2022 they need to flip only six seats to win the House back, and one seat to win the Senate back.
* Their two leaders, Mitch McConnell and Kevin McCarthy, are hamstrung by corporate blacklisting of their election-denying members.

* The GOP brand is radioactive for a huge chunk of America.

* The corporate bans on giving to the 147 House and Senate Republicans who voted against election certification are growing and virtually certain to hold.
We have no emprical evidence -- not a single poll -- suggesting that "the GOP brand is radioactive" for a larger number of people than felt that way before January 6, or on November 3. The Trump brand may be radioactive -- although as the memories of the Capitol riot fade, that could easily cease to be true -- but we know nothing about the public's impression of the GOP as a whole.

And I think VandeHei is wrong about the corporate boycotts of certification challengers. Again, as the memories of January 6 fade, I expect corporations to give the way they always have.
... * Democrats crushed [Republicans] in fundraising when they were out of power. Imagine their edge with it.
Democrats crushed Republicans in fundraising because Democratic voters with disposal income despise Donald Trump. The party has to prove that it can sustain that level of fundraising now that Trump is gone.
* Sheldon Adelson, the party's biggest donor, died Monday.
Yes, but as The Guardian reported in 2019, his wife, who's alive and well, appears to have been the driving force behind the couple's political giving:
Evidence suggests that she is the driver in the couple’s political and philanthropic activities, whether pushing for the relocation of the US embassy to Jerusalem from Tel Aviv or donating an unprecedented $113m to this year’s midterm elections

“Everybody says it’s Sheldon, but it’s Miriam,” says Michael Cherry, the associate chief justice of the Nevada supreme court, who sits on the board of the Las Vegas methadone clinic that the Adelsons founded.
More:
* The NRA is weaker than it has ever been, after massive leadership scandals.
Legal and financial woes might really doom the NRA, but we learned today that it's reincorporating in Texas. When the idea of a move to Texas was first brought up (by Donald Trump) last summer, the state's attorney general and lieutenant governor seemed delighted:


* The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, once controlled by rock-ribbed Republicans, also gave to Democrats in 2020.
The Chamber endorsed 23 first-term Democrats, but it endorsed more first-term Republicans -- 29 of them. And it didn't get a number of those Democratic endorsees reelected: Xochitl Torres Small of New Mexico, Joe Cunningham of South Carolina, Kendra Horn of Oklahoma, TJ Cox and Harley Rouda of California, and Ben McAdams of Utah all lost, while Anthony Brindisi of New York appears to have also been defeated (by 19 votes).

I'd love to believe that the Republican Party is broken and will suffer further losses in 2022. I'd be thrilled if memories of the Trump presidency put an end to its hold on white voters outside cities and upmarket suburbs. But I need to see a lot more evidence of these changes before I'm ready to believe.

*****

UPDATE: Well, there you go:



Pfizer won't give to the 147 House members ... for six months. After that? "We will review our decision" -- meaning they'll drop the boycott.

WHY POLLING ON TRUMP'S REMOVAL IS LESS IMPRESSIVE THAN IT SEEMS TO BE, IN TWO CHARTS

Poll after poll tells us that Americans believe President Trump should be removed from office. A new ABC/Washington Post poll says that a majority of Americans favor barring Trump from ever holding office again.

Yet it should be noted that this ...



...looks an awful lot like this:



Here are the numbers on impeachment and removal from FiveThirtyEight's polling average:
Support: 52.4%
Oppose: 42.3%
And here was the final FiveThirtyEight polling average for the presidential election:
Biden: 51.8%
Trump: 43.4%
Notice the resemblance?

We know how the election turned out: The polls had underestimated Trump's support, presumably because many Trump voters are low in social trust and refuse to talk to pollsters. Biden won the popular vote by 4 percentage points and received 7 million more votes than Trump, but a switch of fewer than 50,000 votes in three states would have left us with a 269-269 Electoral College tie, which would have led to a Trump victory, because Electoral College ties are resolved by giving each state's delegation in the House of Representatives one vote, and Republicans control more House delegations.

We know that everything in American politics outside the blue enclaves is skewed to the GOP. Small rural states have disproportionate power in the Senate, and they're mostly Republican. Gerrymandering allows Republicans to win extra House seats, and the gerrymandering effects are even worse in many state legislatures.

All of which suggests that Trump and the GOP have enough support to ride this out. A handful of Republicans voted for impeachment this week. Some others are straddling the fence:
Freshman Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.), who worked on Trump’s 2016 campaign, said Trump’s actions were so abhorrent that he must have no future in GOP politics. She said the GOP must harness his brand of populism while separating themselves from the president.

“I think the principles and ideas he espoused we’re going to have to champion in the future, but without his support, his brand or his name,” Mace said. “It’s tarnished. I don’t know how you defend what he did last week by any means.”
But by the time the Senate takes up impeachment, he'll be out of office. If law enforcement succeeds in preventing further pro-Trump bloodshed, the public's desire to punish Trump will fade. And we'll be left with a Republican Party in which some people are unabashed Trumpers, particularly at the state and local level, while others merely say he was a fine president, though it's a shame that he had to go lead that insurrection. I predict that no more than two or three Republicans will vote to convict -- McConnell wont, and maybe only Mitt Romney will (again). The public will agree that it's time to move on.

This assumes that there won't be a lot more violence, of course. But if there isn't, the GOP will come out of this unscathed.

Thursday, January 14, 2021

LOVE THY NEIGHBOR? NAHHH.

David Brooks seems surprised to learn that love for Donald Trump has made some Evangelicals a tad psychotic.
“Over the last 72 hours, I have received multiple death threats and thousands upon thousands of emails from Christians saying the nastiest and most vulgar things I have ever heard toward my family and ministry. I have been labeled a coward, sellout, a traitor to the Holy Spirit, and cussed out at least 500 times.”

This is the beginning of a Facebook post from Sunday by the conservative preacher Jeremiah Johnson. On Jan. 7, the day after the storming of the Capitol, Johnson had issued a public apology, asserting that God removed Donald Trump from office because of his pride and arrogance, and to humble those, like Johnson, who had fervently supported him.

The response was swift and vicious. As he put it in that later Facebook post, “I have been flabbergasted at the barrage of continued conspiracy theories being sent every minute our way and the pure hatred being unleashed. To my great heartache, I’m convinced parts of the prophetic/charismatic movement are far SICKER than I could have ever dreamed of.”

This is what is happening inside evangelical Christianity and within conservatism right now. As a conservative Christian friend of mine put it, there is strife within every family, within every congregation, and it may take generations to recover.
That might explain this poll result:
While one in four registered voters now say it’s time for the U.S. to split into two separate countries – Red (Republican) and Blue (Democrat) – a much higher percentage of regular churchgoers and Evangelical Christians favor the idea.

A national survey of 1,200 registered voters conducted by Just the News and pollster Scott Rasmussen conducted January 7-9, 2021 asked the following question:
“Some have suggested that the Red States and Blue States (Republican leaning States and Democratic leaning States) should split into separate countries. Would you favor or oppose splitting the Red States and Blue States into separate countries?”
A quarter (25%) of U.S. voters say they either “Strongly Favor” (11%) or “Somewhat Favor” (14%) dividing the country into two, based on each state’s political leaning....

Regular churchgoers are more likely to favor dividing into Red and Blue Americas, as 40% of those who attend church more than once a week support the move, compared to just 18% of those who never go to church....

By religious persuasion, Evangelicals (43%) are the most likely to support the two-country plan....
(Scott Rasmussen left the polling firm that bears his name in 2013 and now conducts his own surveys. His final presidential poll wasn't skewed right -- he had the race at Biden 51%, Trump 44%, getting Biden's total right and underestimating Trump's by 3 points.)

I'm actually surprised that support for a split is as low as it is among Evangelicals, many of whom don't seem to like the rest of us very much. My guess is that Evangelical support for a split will increase after January 20, when it finally dawns on them that the miracle isn't coming and Joe Biden is actually inaugurated.

In the poll, there's one group in which a majority favors a red-blue split: self-described members of "MAGA Nation," which favors the split by a 52%-43% margin. I expect that number to rise as well after next Wednesday.

MORE EXCELLENT PHILOSOPHIZING FROM THE COOL KIDS' PHILOSOPHER

Mr. Shapiro, 33, a graduate of Harvard Law School, is the cool kid’s philosopher, dissecting arguments with a lawyer’s skill and references to Aristotle.
--from a 2017 New York Times profile of Ben Shapiro
Ben Shapiro is the guest editor of this morning's Politico Playbook, and he uses the opportunity to do some of the cool kids' philosophizing and lawyerly argument-dissecting for which he's so greatly admired. Shapiro writes:
Opposition to impeachment [among House Republicans] comes from a deep and abiding conservative belief that members of the opposing political tribe want their destruction, not simply to punish Trump for his behavior. Republicans believe that Democrats and the overwhelmingly liberal media see impeachment as an attempt to cudgel them collectively by lumping them in with the Capitol rioters thanks to their support for Trump.

The evidence for that position isn’t difficult to find.

Sen. RON WYDEN (D-Ore.) suggested this week at NBCNews.com that the only way to prevent a repeat of the Capitol riot was endorsement of a full slate of Democratic agenda items. Rep. ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ (D-N.Y.) suggested that “Southern states are not red states, they are suppressed states, which means the only way that our country is going to heal is through the actual liberation of Southern states ...” And PAUL KRUGMAN of The New York Times placed blame for the Capitol riots on the entire Republican Party infrastructure: “This Putsch Was Decades In The Making.”

Unity looks a lot like “sign onto our agenda, or be lumped in with the Capitol rioters.”
But Wyden, Ocasio-Cortez, and Krugman aren't saying anything about "unity," or anything resembling “sign onto our agenda, or be lumped in with the Capitol rioters.” Shapiro asserts that they are, and he expects you to accept his assertion because he's made it. But there's no evidence for it.

Wyden, in his NBCNews.com op-ed, writes:
In the wake of this attack, Democrats must use our majorities in Congress to pass reforms that will defend our democracy from the forces that supported, incited and fueled the riots — which means making it easier for every American to vote. Congress cannot — must not — move forward in the belief that the end of Donald Trump's presidency means all is well in our country.

After all, what happened after police cleared the Capitol building and workers began cleaning up the wreckage and blood? Republicans walked right back into the House and Senate chambers and continued spreading the same lies about voters and voting rights that had drawn the mob to the Capitol in the first place.
All Wyden is saying is this: Republicans claim that voting laws make it too easy to cast fraudulent votes, but Democrats believe the laws make it too hard to cast legitimate votes, especially for members of Democratic-leaning groups. Wyden doesn't even mention seeking Republican support for a voting-law overhaul. (Presumably he'd like the reforms passed by simple majorities in the House and then a post-filibuster Senate.)

Shapiro also cites an Ocasio-Cortez Instagram livestream that's quoted in a piece at National Review:
During the stream, she said that Democrats’ U.S. Senate wins in Georgia were a result of “multi-racial” and “multi-cultural” grassroots organization and a sign that “southern states are not red states, they are suppressed states.”

“Which means the only way that our country’s going to heal is through the actual liberation of southern states,” she said. “The actual liberation of the poor, the actual liberation of working people from economic, social, and racial oppression. That’s the only way.”
Is Ocasio-Cortez asserting that Republicans must vote for the Democratic agenda or be lumped with the rioters? No. She's a Democrat rooting for more Democratic electoral wins, which she believes will lead to the enactment of more Democratic policies, which she believes would be good for America. How dare she say this! How dare she assert that people would be better off if the policies she espouses could become law! What does she think she is -- a partisan politician?

Krugman's column is also not about "unity," nor is it an ultimatum to Republicans. He tells us where we are:
One striking aspect of the Capitol Hill putsch was that none of the rioters’ grievances had any basis in reality.

No, the election wasn’t stolen — there is no evidence of significant electoral fraud. No, Democrats aren’t part of a satanic pedophile conspiracy. No, they aren’t radical Marxists — even the party’s progressive wing would be considered only moderately left of center in any other Western democracy.

So all the rage is based on lies. But what’s almost as striking as the fantasies of the rioters is how few leading Republicans have been willing, despite the violence and desecration, to tell the MAGA mob that their conspiracy theories are false.
And where we've been:
... white supremacy has always been sustained in large part through voter suppression. So it shouldn’t be surprising to see right-wingers howling about a rigged election — after all, rigging elections is what their side is accustomed to doing. And it’s not clear to what extent they actually believe that this election was rigged, as opposed to being enraged that this time the usual vote-rigging didn’t work.

But it’s not just about race. Since Ronald Reagan, the G.O.P. has been closely tied to the hard-line Christian right. Anyone shocked by the prevalence of insane conspiracy theories in 2020 should look back to “The New World Order,” published by Reagan ally Pat Robertson in 1991, which saw America menaced by an international cabal of Jewish bankers, Freemasons and occultists. Or they should check out a 1994 video promoted by Jerry Falwell Sr. called “The Clinton Chronicles,” which portrayed Bill Clinton as a drug smuggler and serial killer.
He's saying that the GOP has long used racist manipulation of elections to stay in power, and that the party has been conspiratorialist for decades. He's not demanding forced submission to a Democratic agenda. He's just giving us a history lesson.

Wyden, Ocasio-Cortez, and Krugman aren't threatening to denounce Republicans as coup conspirators if they fail to embrace Democratic policy positions. They seem not to believe that Republicans are capable of reform. They simply want Democrats and Democratic ideas to prevail -- just the way Republicans like Shapiro want Republican ideas to prevail.

But the GOP line of the day is "Democrats are the real aggressors and dividers." I'd say that Shapiro started with this and looked for supporting examples, but he didn't even do that -- he just quoted some Democrats' words and proclaimed that they support his argument.

They don't. He knows they don't. But that's why he makes the big bucks. He doesn't let the fact that he has no case prevent him from making that case.

Wednesday, January 13, 2021

THE GOP IS NOW THE "FREE HELICOPTER RIDES" PARTY

According to a Quinnipiac poll released Monday, approval of the job Donald Trump is doing has dropped to 71% among Republicans, down from 89% in Quinnipiac's previous national poll, taken in December. But in the House of Representatives, Trump's support among Republicans appears much more solid: Of the 207 GOP members who voted on impeachment today, 197 voted no. Trump retained the backing of 95% of House Republicans.

Of course, there might be explanations for the high loyalty rate apart from admiration.


That echoes what Michigan Republican Peter Meijer -- who voted to impeach -- told Reason's Matt Welch about an earlier vote:
... I had colleagues who, when it came time to recognize reality and vote to certify Arizona and Pennsylvania in the Electoral College, they knew in their heart of hearts that they should've voted to certify, but some had legitimate concerns about the safety of their families. They felt that that vote would put their families in danger.
Now, here's the header for a thread about the impeachment vote at the message board thedonald.win:


In case you don't know the meaning of "FREE CHOPPER RIDES," here's an explainer:
The offer of “free helicopter rides” is a reference to the practice of killing people by dropping them from helicopters, made most famous by Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet in the 1970s. Sometimes Pinochet’s “death flights” were conducted over the ocean, but they were also done over rivers and sometimes the land. Hundreds of political dissidents are still unaccounted for from the Pinochet era, but a conservative government estimate from 2001 puts the number of people killed in Chile by being thrown from helicopters at 120.

Despite its disgusting connotations, “free helicopter rides” has become quite a meme online for people who support President Trump and his neo-fascist policies. There are entire Facebook pages devoted to Pinochet’s Free Helicopter Rides, and even websites that sell t-shirts and other gear with the phrase.
I haven't found any explicit threats in the body of the thread -- mostly it's full of despair because the commenters believe the Deep State will never allow them another electoral victory. But maybe that's because explicit threats are discouraged on this board. NBC reports that hardcore insurrection plotters seem to be prefer their conversations encrypted:
Right-wing extremists are using channels on the encrypted communication app Telegram to call for violence against government officials on Jan. 20, the day President-elect Joe Biden is inaugurated, with some extremists sharing knowledge of how to make, conceal and use homemade guns and bombs.

The messages are being posted in Telegram chatrooms where white supremacist content has been freely shared for months, but chatter on the channels has increased since extremists have been forced off other platforms in the wake of the siege of the U.S. Capitol last week by pro-Trump rioters.
If you believe your side will never win another election -- as many (most?) Trump supporters do -- what options are you likely to think you have? You might start to believe that terrorism is your only recourse.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's response to news of death threats against Republican members of Congress is: Welcome to my world.


Daniel Drezner writes:
What is the GOP to do? In some ways we are seeing an emergent strategy. A significant fraction of Trump supporters are comfortable transforming the GOP into an American Hezbollah — a political party that also has an armed wing to coerce other political actors through violence....

The majority within the GOP has a choice to make: They can discipline their own insurrectionists, or they can go the way of Hezbollah and become a violent nonstate actor.
Or a violent state actor, one that controls some local and state governments on a permanent basis, and sometimes controls parts or all of the federal government, while intimidating enemies -- and occasionally members. Is that like Hezbollah? It also sounds a bit like organized crime.

EVERYTHING IS A PLOT TO FRAME POOR, INNOCENT PATRIOTS

John Solomon, the great friend of Rudy Giuliani whose Ukraine stories for The Hill were the framework for the Trumpian counternarrative during impeachment, now suggests at his site Just the News that the Capitol riot might have been a Reichstag fire plotted by Nancy Pelosi:
The FBI admitted Tuesday it received information ahead of the Jan. 6 tragedy suggesting some participants were planning a "war" on the Capitol, including killing officers and distributing maps of the complex. It alerted Washington D.C. law enforcement through the joint terrorism task force alert system. It also "disrupted" the travel plans of some of the suspected trouble-makers....

The New York Police Department is reported to have given the Capitol Police similar intelligence warnings of impending violence....

A senior intelligence official told Just the News he has found no evidence that the president, the White House or the National Security Council was alerted in formal intelligence briefings to the pre-warnings or suspicions of violence the FBI and NYPD have admitted they had....

Former NYPD Commissioner Bernard Kerik told Just the News on Tuesday it appeared the FBI and NYPD did their job in alerting the Capitol Police, but the evidence of a pre-planned attack would undercut the current narrative that Trump had incited a spontaneous insurrection.

"By all accounts, the FBI, NYPD and other authorities did exactly what they should have done by conducting interviews and making notifications to the Washington D.C. authorities," Kerik said. "If these reports are true, you cannot incite a group that already pre-planned acts of violence by days or weeks, and it raises serious questions as to what security precautions were taken at the Capitol as a result."

... What did House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the other leaders in Congress know — and when did they know it — about the possibility for violence and the Pentagon's pre-attack offer to send National Guardsmen to reinforce the Capitol Police?
So Solomon is arguing that the White House was never informed of a plot to start a "war" during a joint session of Congress, but that the Capitol Police were -- and therefore President Trump can't be accused of helping to incite the riot, but Nancy Pelosi ... what was she up to while all this was being planned?

Commenters at Lucianne.com hear what Solomon is saying loud and clear:
Fake News.
Fake election.
Fake riot.
Stalin would be proud of the Deep State thugs and traitors.

****

And what if this was planned and facilitated by insiders? And what if Nancy knew, and this was used as a starting point to try and cancel Trump and 80 million of his people? And even if the FBI/CIA/DOJ/Capitol insiders knew and did nothing to stop it ahead of time? It seems we are at a point where none of this matters or will ever see the light of day. Is the GOP going to do something other than a strongly worded letter? Just another incident in a long line of treacherous/treasonous events that are never resolved with any sort of justice.

****

Of course the left wing crazies were in on the Capitol invasion. They probably instigated and helped finance the whole debacle as part of their plan to ruin Trump forever both politically and financially. The fraudulent vote for president was conducted and they got away with it. Now it is possible that a Republican/conservative will never be chosen again in a local or national election. None of the criminal actions by the dims during the Trump Presidency were brought to trial nor will they be. There doesn't seem to be any way to correct the situation........ just learn to live in the new USA.

God help us !!!!
Meanwhile, Gateway Pundit, which is still arguing that Antifa was responsible for the violence at the Capitol, is warning its readers not to attend that armed demonstrations planned in all fifty state capitols and D.C. on Inauguration Day.

Think about this– Last week the demonic left used the assault on the US Capitol to take away your First Amendment right of Free Speech. Tens of thousands of Americans were removed from social media along with the US President.

The far left tech giants took away President Trump’s ability to communicate freely to the American public.

The next planned operation is to take your guns.
For the record, these “armed protests” in the coming days ARE NOT sanctioned by the Trump Campaign.

We are looking more into who is behind this movement.
So that's the Trumpists' message? "Don't participate in a mass action to overthrow the government unless it's sanctioned by the president"?

Hoft argues that the planned Capitol gathering must be a fake because a person who put up a poster for it on Parler used the hashtag #boogaloo ("Are people really that stupid to put 'boogaloo' in their social media posts?" -- to which I say, "Yes, why not?"), because no organization's name appears on the poster (would you put your group's name on a poster planning the overthrow of the government?), and because attendees are being asked to gather at the same meeting place left-wingers chose as their gathering place for a counterdemonstration on January 6 (which was ... um, the Washington Monument, which I don't believe is a particularly idiosyncratic place to choose as a meeting spot).

But it's the right: Everything bad is a Deep State plot. Nothing bad is ever their fault.