tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3856837.post6234465253641273902..comments2023-10-24T09:06:30.200-04:00Comments on No More Mister Nice Blog: Steve M.http://www.blogger.com/profile/11963290427258439242noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3856837.post-49673550937646191912013-03-08T23:28:05.438-05:002013-03-08T23:28:05.438-05:00thanks for share..thanks for share<a href="http://www.gold007.net/" title="徵信社" rel="nofollow">.</a><a href="http://www.gold007.net/" title="徵信" rel="nofollow">.</a><br />cityhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05583017738947703614noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3856837.post-5965363166554282772013-02-19T23:42:56.160-05:002013-02-19T23:42:56.160-05:00Gosh, I don't remember all these "journal...Gosh, I don't remember all these "journalists" bitching and sobbing when Sarah Palin drove the national debate on health care reform from her Facebook page or Twitter stream.Jackhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01894655800419937862noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3856837.post-74066093786615254762013-02-19T23:02:48.678-05:002013-02-19T23:02:48.678-05:00Folks, aren't we being a wee bit sanctimonious...Folks, aren't we being a wee bit sanctimonious here.<br />Who watches/ reads Lame street media hmmm?<br />Aren't we forgetting the "American way" ... Business is Pop,Junior and Spook (the unholy Trinity). <br />LSM isn't there to inform you or protect our rights (that's spin) and both are inhibitors to business.<br />It's all about tolerance. <br />Simply put; Give the people (consumers) the least they will tolerate and charge the Advertisers (clients) the most they will tolerate The difference is PROFIT. <br /><br />It's a matter of cheapest LSM knows that investigative journalism costs lots of money and the return (% of profit) simply doesn't justify the out lay. Besides most of the public only wants short sensational topics with instant analysis that support their own opinions anyway. <br /><br />Likewise the Internet, the Bloggersphere isn't that crash hot either. Most bloggers are simply <br />'segmenting the the market into niches'. Like LSM the authors are most often under qualified (in either education and or specialised experience) to be reliable, authoritative or objective in other than their limited knowledge and opinions. The latter is often colored by their emotional based bias etc. They tend to rely on the same (justifiably) maligned LSM as sources or other equally suspect bloggers or sites. <br />To be fair most bloggers don't have the resources to investigate/ fact check, research either. <br />In bitter truth both are no more than biased polemic s (albeit with slightly different degrees of similar motives)<br />The other sad fact is that most of the public want to emote rather than examine or be inspired unless it agrees with their preconditioned/conceived views(beliefs) . Ask yourself when was the last time you spent more than a couple of hours on a topic researching or gaining the expertise needed to be objective in your comments? <br /><br />My favorite attack on Extreme conservatives (sic) is to ask them what tertiary knowledge do they have on say ACC (AGW) then ask them some technical questions like list 15 of the 40+ specialised disciplines in involved. In variably they manage 3-4, period. The logic dictates their authoritativeness on the topic. <br /> <br />Call me pedantic (need to get a life) but prior to 'an inconvenient truth' My reading had prompted me to enter under graduate 1st year subjects from a university to learn the basics. ( took 3 months at about 1.5 hrs per night 100 hrs to gain a 'B' at that level) One on line set of classes on the climate alone has 12 X1.5 hrs of videos add the reading and the tutorials. You quickly get the point on how inadequate the MSM and the armchair denier are at coming close to understanding the issues. Much less being able to ask intelligent questions or interpret the significance or reliability of research. Clearly I'm no expert but then again I don't pretend to be either.<br /><br /> To the point at hand given the above facts neither the MSM journalists can rightfully claim any kudos as a source but then again neither can we (I) . Examinatorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08990595916031900662noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3856837.post-62098859798712613402013-02-19T18:15:38.455-05:002013-02-19T18:15:38.455-05:00So, 12 years of ignoring Reagan and Bush Sr., and...So, 12 years of ignoring Reagan and Bush Sr., and after 8 years of sniffing in the Clinton families garbage, and poking around in their stuff, and then 8 years of being human @$$-lickers, knob-polishers, cojones washers, and stenographers, for the Bush JR. mis-administration, and then following that up with 4 years of reading right-wing talking points during Obama's Presidency, they have the temerity to whine about how they're treated?<br /><br />Go whine on someone else's dime, Ed Henry & Co.<br />You're about as relevant as mammaries on a male bovine. And Ed, you're even less relevant than that.<br /><br />What a bunch of pampered @$$holes!!!Victorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06609452382111686086noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3856837.post-51360684958199535302013-02-19T17:57:02.774-05:002013-02-19T17:57:02.774-05:00"The frustrated Obama press corps neared rebe..."The frustrated Obama press corps neared rebellion ..."<br /><br />Rebel against, exactly, what? For that matter, exactly, how?<br /><br />Fracking kandi assed kry babies.<br /><br />No fear...Ten Bearshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06594307610015584119noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3856837.post-69230098003028751502013-02-19T17:34:20.486-05:002013-02-19T17:34:20.486-05:00I read that book on Reagan manipulated the press. ...I read that book on Reagan manipulated the press. No surprise that today's stenographers, uh, I mean, journalists haven’t!otismymanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00686134324722445193noreply@blogger.com