Tuesday, January 10, 2017

IF TRUMP FANS ARE REALLY AS SUGGESTIBLE AS THEY SEEM, HIDE THE BABIES (LITERALLY)

This is horrifying:
President-elect Donald Trump asked Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a proponent of a widely discredited theory that vaccines cause autism, to chair a new commission on vaccine safety and scientific integrity, Kennedy said Tuesday.

The stunning move ... comes after Trump -- who has long been critical of vaccines -- met at Trump Tower with Kennedy, who has spearheaded efforts to roll back child vaccination laws....

Kennedy has been a notable proponent of nonmedical exemptions for parents who seek to prevent their children from being vaccinated, which is mandatory in most states.

He has argued that mercury-based additives in vaccines explain the link to autism. And he has alleged that government scientists, journalists and pharmaceutical companies have colluded to hide the truth from the public.

“They get the shot. That night they have a fever of 103. They go to sleep, and three months later their brain is gone,” Kennedy said at the premiere of an anti-vaccination film screening in California in 2015. “This is a holocaust, what this is doing to our country.
A lot of us have known for a while that Trump is a vaccine skeptic:
Even before he entered politics, Trump said he believed vaccines cause autism. In an interview with the Sun-Sentinel in 2007, he said:
“When I was growing up, autism wasn't really a factor…And now all of a sudden, it's an epidemic. Everybody has their theory. My theory, and I study it because I have young children, my theory is the shots. We've giving these massive injections at one time, and I really think it does something to the children.”
In 2014, Trump tweeted: “Healthy young child goes to doctor, gets pumped with massive shot of many vaccines, doesn't feel good and changes - AUTISM. Many such cases!”
But I don't know how many Trump supporters really noticed. Now he has the opportunity to provide a huge megaphone for the anti-vaccination movement -- much bigger than that of Jenny McCarthy, who did (and continues to do) tremendous harm.

Here's what I worry about. A few years ago, right-wingers generally distrusted Vladimir Putin. Sure, there seemed to be a few conservative commentators who swooned over his strongman act. But the rank and file weren't huge fans.

Then Trump came along, and:
Back in July 2014 just 10 percent of Republicans held a favorable view of Putin, according to a poll conducted by the Economist and YouGov. By September of 2016, that number rose to 24 percent. And it's even higher today: 37 percent of Republicans view Putin favorably, the poll found in December.
If Trump and Kennedy make a great show of denouncing established science on vaccines at some point in the future, how many Trump diehards are going to decide that the great man is right about this issue? Will some deplorables stop (or delay) vaccinating their kids? What happens to the rest of us in that case?

I'm reading about this at the same time I'm reading a short New Republic piece titled "Hillary Clinton’s Cabinet Would Have Been Bad." It's based on a ex-Politico writer Mike Allen's list of possible appointees in a Clinton Cabinet. The conclusion of NR's Sarah Jones:
If Allen’s list is accurate, Clinton viewed the presidency as an opportunity to empower her wealthy, centrist allies.
Yes, but no Clinton appointee at any level would have deliberately encouraged Americans to expose entire populations to extremely dangerous infection diseases -- among other ways in which even centrist mediocrities are better than the hardball-playing maximalist right-wing ideologues and dyed-in-the-wool bigotsTrump is bringing into the government.

10 comments:

Grung_e_Gene said...

Sure Trump is nominatong a cadre of thieves, liars, criminals, and morans dedicated to destroying the agencies they will be in charge of but her emails...

Diane Rodriguez said...

Wonder why Trump is even interested. He's neither scientifically inclined nor has any empathy for people who are disabled or vulnerable. Makes you seriously consider the suggestion that the youngest child is autistic. Both Obama children made the transition to DC and Sasha was much younger. If the child is autistic, I have the same empathy for him as any other autistic child. The twitidiot not so much.

Ivory Bill Woodpecker said...

[snark]

B-b-b-but E-MAIIIILZZZZZZ !!!1!

[/snark]

Also, this. (NSFW for naughty words)

Leo Artunian said...

It's also reasonably certain that Clinton would not have appointed cabinet members on the basis of their opposition to the existence of the cabinet office they were to lead. But po-tay-toe, po-tah-toe, right?

Never Ben Better said...

If he deliberately set out to destroy every facet of what government does for its citizens, he couldn't be doing a better job.

Which does make one wonder....

Green Eagle said...

"37 percent of Republicans view Putin favorably"

Trump's approval rating sunk to 37% in a poll released today. By election day, he is going to be less popular than Putin.

rclz said...

This shit is scary. I'd rather not see a resurgence of polio.

LibraryGuy said...

I wish I could comment on the original NR article. I can't stand this kind of commentary. She says
"Sandberg’s only qualifications for that position (Treasury secretary) are that she is wealthy and friendly with Clinton. Those two characteristics, wealth and loyalty, constitute the same low standard Donald Trump has applied to his own cabinet nominees." This is such utter BS. Sandberg graduated from Harvard summa cum laude and received an award as top economics student. She worked for a year on health problems in India. She got her MBA with highest distinction and was Larry Summers' chief of staff at Treasury for 5 years. This is the exact opposite of Trump's cabinet picks!

swkellogg said...

One need only visit an old cemetery to appreciate how ignorant these people are.

rclz said...

It occurs to me that for years democrats have fought "states rights" because republicans use it to stop a woman's right to choose and a litany of other rights.

It could be that things are about to change. States Rights might be the only way that the blue states can keep any semblance of normalcy. Sure we have pockets even in Washington that don't immunize their kids but I think most people still do it.

Didn't Jerry Brown sign a law not long ago saying if you want your kids in school, they have to have shots?

If there is whole sale slaughter of regulations the only place livable may just be the blue states. Wonder if we can raise enough beef, chicken eta, and raise enough veggies to make it through 4 years.

How about Gay Marriage? It was legal here even before the SC waded in....

Legal Pot anyone?

Yea, states rights might just be our way out.